// docs / ai fix prompts
AI improvement prompts
Every finding has a Copy prompt button beneath the remediation. Click it, paste into Claude / Cursor / Copilot, and the agent gets the canonical improvement recipe for that website-quality issue β no Claude API call from us.
Na sala e cakacaka kina
E rua na pieces of data e combine ena click:
- Na finding β title, description, evidence, remediation, CWE β sa loaded oti kei na report.
- Na framework ni nomu codebase β detected mai na scan's
discovery.tech-fingerprintfindings (Next.js, React, Vue, Django, Express, Rails, Laravel, Flask). Falls back ki na generic recipe ni sega ni detected e dua na framework (qai kerea na agent prompt vua na LLM me detect mai na repo state).
Templates live in lib/scanner/fix-prompts.ts. The registry has check-specific guidance for crawlability, search presentation, semantic content, structured data, media, performance, accessibility, forms, mobile/i18n, runtime, owner journeys, and repo-quality issues. For everything else, the existing remediation field on the finding becomes the generic recipe.
Na irairai ni prompt
Fix the "Hero image is lazy-loaded and missing dimensions" finding on /pricing. Issue: The largest above-the-fold image is marked loading="lazy" and has no explicit width/height. That can delay LCP and create layout shift. Codebase context: Next.js. Recommended fix: Use next/image or the existing image component with explicit width/height, responsive sizes, meaningful alt text, and priority/fetchPriority for the first major visual on the page. Constraints: - Don't break existing tests; run the test suite after the change. - Match the codebase's existing style and lint config. - Add a brief comment explaining the performance reasoning only where the fix would otherwise look arbitrary. - If the fix needs a new dependency, install it via the project's package manager (npm / pnpm / pip / bundle / composer). Reference: Core Web Vitals / Largest Contentful Paint guidance.
Frameworks e tokoni
Keitou surface framework-specific snippets me baleta:
- Next.js, React, Vue, Nuxt, Svelte (frontend)
- Express, Fastify (Node.js backend)
- Django, Flask (Python)
- Ruby on Rails
- Laravel (PHP)
- ASP.NET Core (planned, fallback to generic today)
Framework detection e best-effort. Keitou sniff __NEXT_DATA__ tags, __NUXT__, hash cookies (laravel_session), X-Powered-By headers, kei na signals tale eso. Kevaka o running e dua na custom framework, na prompt e fall back ki generic recipe ka na vakasamataka na agent mai na nomu package.json.
Vakayagataka mai nomu AI agent
Kevaka o sa wired up na MCP server, na same prompt e exposed me slash command. Mai Claude Desktop:
/fixweb-fix finding_id=550e8400-e29b-41d4-a716-446655440000
The renderer looks up the finding, detects the framework from the parent scan when available, renders the templated prompt, and injects it into your conversation as the user message. No round-trip to our Claude API; templates are pure and free.
Na vuna keitou sega ni hit Claude ena click yadua
Ena launch keitou a consider calling the Anthropic API ena click yadua me refine na prompt kei codebase context. Keitou sega, baleta:
- Na agent e paste kina na user sa tiko oti vua na codebase context β era vakayagataka tiko Cursor / Claude Desktop kei na nodra repo e open.
- Templating per-(check Γ framework) e cover ~80% ni value ka sega na per-click cost.
- E rawa ni fire na API e muri e dua na opt-in βRefine with AI for my codebaseβ kevaka era vinakata users. Nikua, sega.
